Know what the city will flag before you submit.

Run your plans through Olumba.

Review my plansSee pricing$39 per check · no subscription
Olumba

Olumba guide

Answer a couple of questions and I’ll point you to the right next step.

Olumba
Has this submittal gone to the city yet?

Have plans ready?

Your last project

How long did round two cost, and who had to explain it?

You think back to your last project. Fill in what really happened and we’ll lay it out end to end, so you can see what it would have been worth to catch round two before it started.

I filed in , my city takes about weeks to look at it, my team needs weeks to turn a correction letter around, and that one went rounds.

Plan check · 6w
Your turn · 3w
Plan check 2 · 6w
Your turn · 3w
Plan check 3 · 6w
Sitting on a plan checker’s deskBack with your team

There it is. 24 weeks, and 18 of them spent waiting on an answer somebody could have given you the morning you filed.

The grey stops being yours the second you hit submit. That is the part that costs you.

Review my plans

A round of corrections eats more of your team’s week than a check costs. You already know what an hour of that is worth.

Some people wait 6 weeks to hear what the city thinks. Some hear it today.

Every duration above is the one you entered, not our estimate.

Every finding arrives with its evidence.

Professionals act on evidence, not vibes. Here is what one finding looks like in your report.

SHEET A-201 · CBC 1017.2SAMPLE FINDING

Egress path exceeds allowable travel distance to exit discharge

The corridor route from Suite 210 measures roughly 265 feet to the nearest exit discharge, over the 250-foot limit for sprinklered B occupancies. This exact condition was flagged in 8 of the last 10 comparable sets we have seen from this jurisdiction.

Confidence

High

Seen in recent sets

8 / 10

Maps to

CBC 1017.2

Plan Proof and Backcheck are preliminary AI reviews. You confirm every item; they don’t replace your judgment or the city’s.

Three ways in

$39

Per check. No subscription necessary. Credits never expire.

City by city

Built on the correction letters your jurisdictions actually send, and on your own firm’s history as you parse it.

Every finding

Sheet reference, code or checklist item, and a confidence level. Evidence, not vibes.

Run the city’s review before you file.

Upload your plans

Drop in the PDF for one submittal. Plan Proof reads the drawings the way a plan checker would, sheet by sheet.

Get your likely corrections

Each finding carries a sheet reference, the code or checklist item it maps to, how often it shows up in real sets for your city, and a confidence level.

Fix them before you submit

Resolve the findings on your schedule, then file a cleaner set and skip the costly resubmittal loop.

Close the whole correction loop, not just the first pass.

Backcheck yourself before the city backchecks you. When the agency’s letter comes back, Olumba captures it and checks your resubmittal against it. You send back a set that answers every item, and you always know whose court the ball is in.

01

Plan Proof before you file

Likely corrections, fixed on your schedule

02

The city’s letter arrives

Paste or upload it. It becomes a tracked list, code refs intact

03

Backcheck it before the city does

Flags anything your resubmittal does not visibly address

Your next set can go in cleaner.

Upload your plans and see what your jurisdiction is likely to flag, with the evidence behind every finding.

Run your first check, $39